Thursday, March 4, 2010

THE MONEY MASTERS Part 1 Part 2

Also watch FIREWALL: (http://www.larouchepac.com/firewall) "The powers of financial capitalism had a far-reaching plan, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole...Their secret is that they have annexed from governments, monarchies, and republics the power to create the world's money..." THE MONEY MASTERS is a 3 1/2 hour non-fiction, historical documentary that traces the origins of the political power structure that rules our nation and the world today. The modern political power structure has its roots in the hidden manipulation and accumulation of gold and other forms of money. The development of fractional reserve banking practices in the 17th century brought to a cunning sophistication the secret techniques initially used by goldsmiths fraudulently to accumulate wealth. With the formation of the privately-owned Bank of England in 1694, the yoke of economic slavery to a privately-owned "central" bank was first forced upon the backs of an entire nation, not removed but only made heavier with the passing of the three centuries to our day. Nation after nation, including America, has fallen prey to this cabal of international central bankers. Segments: The Problem; The Money Changers; Roman Empire; The Goldsmiths of Medieval England; Tally Sticks; The Bank of England; The Rise of the Rothschilds; The American Revolution; The Bank of North America; The Constitutional Convention; First Bank of the U.S.; Napoleon's Rise to Power; Death of the First Bank of the U.S. / War of 1812; Waterloo; Second Bank of the U.S.; Andrew Jackson; Fort Knox; World Central Bank; Loose Change 911 truth police state globalists NWO New World Order Federal Reserve Alex Jones Aaron Russo America From Freedom To Fascism zionist IMF BIS John Perkins 911 911 Globalism bilderberg Rothschild Rockefeller Schiff Warburg illuminati bohemian grove idi amin freemason Also recommended: "Firewall: In Defense of Nation State" http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=8415519765816415310 Video news on "Federal Reserve": http://newstree.org/search.jsp?query=Federal+Reserve&hp=10&s=Video&vx=1«


THE MONEY MASTERS




Check out my website. http://www.icelandcrash.com

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Icesave - Iceland. The Icesave agreements and other national measures in response of the financial crisis: Revisiting the principles of State liability, State aid and non-discrimination in European law

Elvira Méndez Pinedo - elvira.blog.is

M. Elvira Méndez-Pinedo. Associate Professor of European Law. University of Iceland
Report drafted 1st February 2010. Not published.

(Please contact me by mail at mep(at)hi.is for the report with the charts)
 
Abstract and executive summary
This study describes and analysis the Icesave dispute and Ice-save agreements between Iceland, the UK and Holland in the light of European law (EU and EEA law) focusing on two main issues relevant to the proper resolution of this dispute: 1) the State liability for breaches of EU/EEA law on the basis of Directive 94/19/EC following a systemic bank collapse in Iceland; and 2) the principle of non discrimination concerning the nationalisation of Icelandic banks (State aid) and the payment of the minimum guarantee of 20.889 € to depositors of Icesave accounts in the branches of Landsbanki in the UK and Holland. It will be argued how the European legal order has proved to be incomplete, fragmented and unable to cope with the legal problems arising from the Icesave dispute.

In the first place, the rules of State liability of EU/EEA law in this case are very unclear and uncertain. In the second place, it is questionable whether the Icelandic emergency measures violate EU/EEA law in the light of other national measures adopted by EU Member States during the crisis. In the third place, we will analyse how the real core of the dispute – the nationalisation of private debt left by the collapse of the Icelandic banking system in the UK and Holland and the measures adopted for the reconstruction of the financial sector in Iceland and based on the connection to Icelandic economy– might not fall under the scope of present EU/EEA law after all.

This study will argue that, while the Icesave dispute relates to a highly complicated problem created by the internal market of banking and financial services; the nationalisation of banking entities after a financial crisis is a new problem in EU law for which the EU Treaties and European jurisprudence have no legal answer so far. It will also explain how, from a legal point of view, this cross-border dispute is located at the outer limits of EU/EEA law, in grey areas that are very difficult to solve on a bilateral basis. If the EU has no competence over this new problem, the competence belongs to the Member States. The same applies in EEA law. In these circumstances, the principle of legality would mean that the application of the principles of State liability and non-discrimination in EU/EEA law do not come into play.

MORE: http://elvira.blog.is/blog/elvira/entry/1013839/


Check out my website. http://www.icelandcrash.com/

Saturday, January 30, 2010

Iceland president: We are being bullied - CNN.com

ICELAND PRESIDENT OLAFUR RAGNAR GRIMSSON


London, England (CNN) -- Iceland's president accused the United Kingdom and the Netherlands on Friday of financially "bullying" his country.

Olafur Ragnar Grimsson said the two countries had been "using their influence within the International Monetary Fund" to stop it lending Iceland billions of dollars needed to rebuild the country's debt-ridden economy.

"We are being bullied. The British and the Dutch are using their influence within the IMF to prevent the IMF program from going forward," Grimsson told CNN's Richard Quest.

"We have a situation, where a small nation is in fact ready to shoulder part of this burden but doesn't want to be put in a corner where the very survival of its economy in the next 10 years would be at stake."

The comments came after the UK expressed anger at the highly controversial decision by Iceland's president's to veto a bill that would pay back billions of dollars Iceland owes the UK and Netherlands. Britain was forced to spend $3.69 billion last year to cover the losses that British savers incurred when Icelandic banks collapsed.

The British and Dutch governments condemned the decision by President Grimsson and hinted at repercussions for Iceland's bid to join the European Union and for its $10bn international economic rescue program.
Despite being already approved by Iceland's parliament, Grimsson refused to sign the bill and called for a national referendum.
Grimsson told CNN: "May I remind that if you take the sum that the Icelandic taxpayers are asked to shoulder and you transform it in to the British economic system to get the relative size, this is equal to the British taxpayers being asked to pay £700 billion ($1.1 trillion) for the years and decades to come."
Icelandic Prime Minister Johanna Sigurdardottir hinted that the move could further tarnish the country's image and crush its hopes to become a member of the European Union.
"Uncertainty... in the formal dealings with others countries can have unforeseen, wide-ranging and potentially damaging consequences for our society," she warned.
Announcing that Iceland was bankrupt ... was at worst, financial terrorism on their part--Olafur Ragnar Grímsson And while the repayment of Iceland's debt to the UK and the Netherlands is not theoretically a pre-condition for it to receive IMF funding, the president's actions could hinder it.
But Grimsson told CNN his move was in the name of democracy. He said he acted in response to the one-quarter of Icelanders who petitioned against the compensation bill that would cost about $17,300 per Icelandic citizen.



Announcing that Iceland was bankrupt ...
was at worst, financial terrorism on their part

--Olafur Ragnar Grímsson
"We have forgotten that there are two pillars in the western heritage that we are proud of. One is the evolution of the free market but the second is the evolution of democracy," Grimsson told CNN.
"And what I did was when I was faced with a decision between the financial concerns on the one hand, and democracy on the other, I decided to go with democracy."
Grimsson's veto also reflects his country's anger with their treatment at British hands at the height of the economic crisis, when the UK employed anti-terror legislation to freeze Icelandic assets.
"They put my country, on the official Web site, the British government Web site, side by side with al Qaeda and the Taliban.
"And the second thing was that Gordon Brown in October and Alistair Darling went on global television, including CNN and stated that Iceland was a bankrupt country.
"Which was utter nonsense at its best and financial terrorism on their part at its worst." He added: "This meant that companies all over the world, who had had dealings with Iceland, closed their operations down."
As a result, said Grimsson, his economy was damaged by the British "to a greater extent than otherwise would have been the case."
In a statement on January 6, however, a spokesperson for the British prime minister said that "the Government expects the loan to be repaid.
"We are obviously very disappointed by the decision by the Icelandic President, but we do expect Iceland to live up to its legal obligations and repay the money."

REUTERS in DAVOS.


Check out my website. http://www.icelandcrash.com/
and                               http://www.rifflar.com/

Friday, January 29, 2010

Issa: AIG Investigation Just Getting Started

January 29, 2010 (LPAC)—Following Wednesday's hearing of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform examining the government's role in bailing out AIG counterparties and hiding its details from the American public, Ranking Member Darrell Issa (R-CA) made public a document (Schedule A) that the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (FRBNY) wanted kept confidential by the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) until 2018. This 5-page document is a list of approximately 400 worthless credit default swap deals that were paid at 100% of par at the insistence of Fed Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and New York Federal Reserve Bank Chairman Timothy Geithner.

Schedule A includes the names of all of AIG's counterparties, the identification numbers of each transaction, and the prices at which Maiden Lane 3 was purchasing the underlying assets. In the end, AIG's filings on December 2, 2008, and December 24, 2008, included the agreements between AIG and ML3 but omitted Schedule A. The Schedule A was finally submitted under pressure from the SEC, but was kept "in a special area at the SEC where national security related files are kept."
Issa also released a 22-page report: "Public Disclosure as a Last Resort: How the Federal Reserve Fought to Cover Up the Details of the AIG Counterparties Bailout from the American People."

In this second document, several emails further establish that Geithner lied under oath when he stated that he had recused himself from the AIG matter.

* On November 6, 2008, Sarah Dahlgren, the FRBNY's lead staff member in AIG's operations, emailed Geithner with a proposed statement regarding AIG's upcoming equity capital raise for Geithner's approval: "If you are good with this, ... we would also make sure that the company sticks to this line ...."

* On November 13, Geithner received a report on AIG's restructuring that would be sent to Congress, which Geithner had asked to personally review. Sophia Allison, a staff member of the Federal Reserve's Board of Governors, e-mailed the draft congressional report to several Federal Reserve staff. Michael Nelson, a staff member of the FRBNY, fowarded Allison's email to Geithner with the following message: "Tim — this is the draft EESA-required filing on AIG that the Board owes the Hill, as you requested."

* In addition, Geithner's meeting logs show that he had at least six formal meetings with the top FRBNY staff members about AIG-related issues between November 4, 2008, and November 21, 2008.

* Also, Geithner did not respond to a request from Issa for an interview before the hearing. He did, however, meet with Congressman Cummings together with Tom Baxter, General Counsel of the FRBNY, on Friday January 15, 2010, even though Baxter was scheduled to be a witness at the hearing as well. It is Baxter, who has claimed that Geithner had recused himself from AIG case.

In releasing these documents, Issa said: "It's not conjecture, its not speculation, it's fact, the New York Fed gave a back-door bailout to AIG's counterparties and then tried to cover it up. The veil of secrecy that swept through the Fed embraced a mentality that treated transparency as a dispensable luxury rather than a moral imperative."

Regarding Secretary Timothy Geithner's testimony addressing the NYFRB's efforts to limit public disclosure, Issa said, "If he didn't know, he should have and no one has answered the question as to why the New York Fed were so adamant at keeping details of the counterparty deal confidential. If he or anyone else thinks that this investigation will stop after today's hearing, they are completely mistaken. There has been a widespread effort by officials at the NY Fed to thwart transparency and working with the SIGTARP, we will continue to pursue this investigation for as long as it takes to get the truth. Unfortunate as it may be for those who acted deliberately to deceive the American people, there is no statute of limitations in our pursuit of transparency."

Check out my website. http://www.icelandcrash.com

Geithner Lie on Recusal in AIG Case Exposed

January 29, 2010 (LPAC)—During his testimony at the hearing of the House Oversight and Government Reform yesterday, Timothy Geithner lied that he had nothing to do with the New York Federal Reserve Bank decision to allow AIG to pay several banks, including Goldman Sachs, 100% of par on credit default swaps.

In the hearing, Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio) pressed Geithner to prove that he had recused himself from decisions with regard to AIG: "Can you provide for the record a copy of the recusal agreement that you signed when you were at the New York Fed?" Geithner answered: "I did not sign a recusal agreement. I withdrew from day-to-day management, operations, policies of the New York Fed, and my colleagues both in Washington and in New York can attest to that. This was very important to do."

However, during the same hearing, Neil M. Barofsky, Special Inspector General of the TARP bailout program, testified to the following in his statement to the committee: "On November 7th, 2008, FRBNY employees involved with the negotiations reported to then-FRBNY President Geithner on the efforts to convince AIG counterparties to accept haircuts on their claims against AIG in return for unwinding the CDS contracts. Noting both the willingness of UBS to negotiate a small haircut and the generally negative reactions from the other counterparties, these FRBNY offials recommended that FRBNY cease negotiations and proceed with paying the counterparties the market value of their underlying CDOs and permitting them to keep the collateral already posted, effectively paying them par for securities that collectively had a market value, based on the amount of the collateral payments of approximately 48 cents on the dollar. According to these FRBNY executives, then-President Geithner 'acquiesced' to the executives' proposal. When asked by SIGTARP if the executives felt they had received their 'marching orders from then-FRBNY President Geithner to pay the counterparties par, one FRBNY official responded 'yes, absolutely.' The decision to pay effective par value was then brought before the Board of Directors of the FRBNY and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve. Each body gave its approval."

Moreover, at the end of the hearing, according to the Financial Times, a previously unpublished e-mail was disclosed: Written by 'TFG75' — Timothy Franz Geithner — to senior Fed officials, it asked: 'Where are you on the AIG counterparty disclosure issue?' The e-mail was written on March 15, 2009, the day on which the names of AIG's counterparties were released.


Check out my website. http://www.icelandcrash.com

LaRouche: We are at War and the Enemy is the British Empire | LaRouchePAC

January 29, 2010 (LPAC)—As we approach Lyndon LaRouche's international webcast tomorrow, Saturday, January 30, 2010, the mass strike in the U.S. whose leadership is Lyndon LaRouche, is zeroing in on the center of British monetarism in the U.S.—Wall Street and the Federal Reserve system. Even the "go along to get along"-controlled U.S. Senate was driven by this mass strike to cast 30 votes against the reconfirmation of "Bailout" Ben Bernanke, the most votes ever cast against a nominee for chairman of the British-controlled Federal Reserve.
While Bernanke was reconfirmed yesterday, the drive to nail both Geithner and Bernanke is now escalating. As Lyndon LaRouche said today, "It's not going to go away. This is the end of some people, the end of some people's careers."

In the case of Geithner, he could be facing perjury charges. During sworn testimony before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Thursday, he admitted that he did not sign an agreement recusing himself from the AIG matter. Nonetheless, he claimed: "I withdrew from day-to-day management, operations, policies of the New York Fed, and my colleagues both in Washington and in New York can attest to that." Unfortunately for Geithner, Neil Barofsky, Special Inspector General of TARP, who also testified at the hearing, contradicted Geithner on this matter, and reported that FRBNY executives have stated to his office that they met with Geithner on the AIG credit default swaps deal, and that Geithner "acquiesced" to their proposal to pay the AIG credit default swaps at 100%. When asked by Barofsky's office if the executives felt they had received their "marching orders" from Geithner to pay the counterparties par, one FRBNY official responded, "Yes, absolutely."
On Monday, the ranking members of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, led by Rep. Issa, released a 22-page report entitled: "How the Federal Reserve Fought to Cover up the Details of the AIG Counterparties Bailout from the American People." The report releases a number of e-mails from FRBNY officials which prove that Geithner was deeply involved in the policy decision. His meeting log also shows that he conducted six formal meetings on AIG in November 2008 with staff.

But it is not only Geithner who is in trouble. On Tuesday, Rep. Issa sent a letter to Committee Chair Edolphus Towns urging him to issue a new subpoena in the AIG case, this time to the Federal Reserve. Issa points out that new information has come to light about documents in the possession of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors regarding the Federal Reserve's decision to bail out AIG in September of 2008. Issa points out that his office has received important information from a whistleblower who has identified specific documents which detail Bernanke's personal involvement in the decision to pay AIG credit default swaps at 100%.

So even as Bernanke was reconfirmed as Fed Chair, he is about as secure in his office as Nixon was after the 1972 elections.
After the hearings on Wednesday, Rep. Issa released a statement in which he said of Geithner: "If he or anyone else thinks that this investigation will stop after today's hearing, they are completely mistaken."

Issa also released a 5-page document, the "Schedule A" which AIG filed with the SEC, detailing all of the credit default swaps paid by AIG to Goldman Sachs, etc. The FRBNY had tried to prevent this information from being filed. When it was finally filed, the SEC was supposed to seal it until the year 2018 and keep it in a location designated for national security items. But now it has been released publicly in unredacted form.

At the same time, there are increasing indications, as Lyndon LaRouche said today, that some people who want to stay in public life, recognize that this is the obvious time to jump ship. Democrats are jumping ship to get on the Republican payroll.

A case in point is a deal struck on Wednesday between the Chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Cal) and Rep. Michael Burgess (R-Tx.) to launch an investigation of the corrupt deal made by the Obama White House with the pharmaceutical companies, the hospitals, and the doctors, at the point that the drive for Obama deathcare was being launched. Waxman, one of three House committee chairmen responsible for shepherding the House version of Obama deathcare through the House, agreed to help Republicans get a comprehensive list of meetings the White House held with industry representatives, as well as records documenting calls and emails between outside groups and the Department of Health and Human Services.
Meanwhile, as Lyndon LaRouche has emphasized, Britain's puppet in the White House, Obama himself, is nearing the end of his Neronic career. Instead of listening to the mass strike process, in his State of the Union speech Obama proved himself, as LaRouche has stated, constitutionally in incapable of change. He insisted, instead, upon continuing to push his Nazi death bill and fascist "green energy" policy.

Even the Wall Street Journal lead editorial caught the flavor of Obama's tendency toward political suicide, comparing Obama to Willy Loman in Arthur Miller's Death of a Salesman. As the Journal wrote: "On health care, Mr. Obama offered a Willy Loman-esque soliloquy on his year-long effort, as if his bill's underlying virtues and his own hard work haven't been truly appreciated by the American public."

As the suppression of the article by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard exposing the intention of the British Empire to eliminate national sovereignty, demonstrates, the war we are engaged in is for the sovereign capacity of nation states, acting in concert to develop their respective peoples against a monetarist British Empire intent upon killing those same people. Evans-Pritchard compares the British-controlled EU beauracracy to the ultramontane medieval papacy with its jesuitical lawyers. It was against this ultramontane imperialist system that Nicolaus Cusa in 1433 wrote that the emperor "derives his power from the people." This is the principle which the British Empire and their puppet Obama are denying at their own peril.
As LaRouche has emphasized, the mass strike currently under way in the U.S., as reflected in the Massachusetts election, reflects precisely this principle, embedded in the U.S. Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution.
It is this principle which is now defining politics in the U.S. and, by extension, throughout the world. The population is ready to fight. The only problem is, that it doesn't know the solution. Lyndon LaRouche does.

Thursday, January 28, 2010

LaRouche Warned: "Don't Betray the Country with this Bail-Out!" | LaRouchePAC




January 28, 2010 (LPAC)-- Wednesday Jan. 27's blatant lying under oath by Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, who disclaimed all knowledge of the key decisions in history's biggest bail-out (as did Hank Paulson), and blamed everything on a third-level assistant, has all the hounds baying for Geithner's ouster. Geithner will have to go. But in fact, the decisions he is lying about came not from him, but from the White House under two successive Presidencies. But indeed, in reality, those decisions were not made by either one of those Presidents, either. Obama is nothing but a puppet. They were made behind the scenes.

History is not a series of events, not a ping-pong game, it's a process. And that is what economists and politicians today don't understand. Think back to the Fall of 2008. Then, when all the other top leaders were repeating in unison that this bail-out must go through, it was only Lyndon LaRouche who provided a rallying point against it. Every one of those other leaders, made a terrible mistake. They disagreed with LaRouche, and look what happened!

Listen to his prophetic warning from his webcast of October 1, 2008.

Link to Video: Click Here